10km
1 O40 Jeremy O'DONOVAN (170) 00:34:55 00:34:55
2 SENIOR Trevor CUMMINS (179) 00:36:05 00:36:04
3 O45 Wieslaw SOSNOWSKI (286) 00:36:18 00:36:17
1 O45 Gillian SOHUN (42) 00:44:48 00:44:46
2 SENIOR Jane PETERS (189) 00:44:59 00:44:51
3 O45 Helen O'CALLAGHAN (198) 00:45:55 00:45:52
5km
1 O45 Ed BYRNE (518) 00:19:30
2 SENIOR James CONNOLLY (631) 00:19:34
3 SENIOR David SHERIDAN (578) 00:19:56
1 O40 Rosaleen MACKEOWN (634) 00:20:00
2 O40 Linda O CONNOR (509) 00:21:09
3 O40 Maeve HURLEY (545) 00:23:13
Results
Photos...
1) Siobhan Russell has a gallery HERE
8 comments:
10k measured a bit long I think
Is it true the course could have measured long? And before I get the usual "GPS isn't accurate" comments I don't mean by GPS, more than one person has mentioned it.
I had the same, 10.33km, but you know what, it was well organised, the stewards did a great job, all the kids seemed to enjoy themselves, the medal was a nice touch, i think most will get over it. Well done to the Crosshaven crew.
It seems to be a minimal requirement to get the race distance correct. After all it was an 'out and back' course so it's not like it's that difficult. I'll gladly trade the medal next year for a accurate course.....and some kind of signage showing where registration is.
I got 10.32km, we all can't be wrong, however a great morning. Everyone helping out did a great job. Will definitely be back next year.
The 1st thing that any race should make sure is correct is the distance. All these nice to haves are pointless when the course isn't accurate. Same thing with Kinsale. The worst thing is, people seem to think its ok and races will continue to be just thrown together to make money
I had 10.35. It's quite significant difference as for 10K. But for me the bad thing is I'm not even on finishers list.
Some of the results of the 10km race seem to be mis-categorised as 5km participants. Am querying with the organisers / time keepers.
Post a Comment